<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kev009.com &#187; xen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kev009.com/wp/tag/xen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp</link>
	<description>Speed and Accuracy are fine, kev009 is final: Projects and Ventures of Kevin Bowling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Xen 3.4.1 on RHEL/CentOS 5.4</title>
		<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/10/xen-3-4-1-on-rhelcentos-5-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/10/xen-3-4-1-on-rhelcentos-5-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kev009</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datacenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gitco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kev009.com/wp/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m happy to report that the updated Gitco Xen 3.4.1 repo is working well on CentOS 5.4. If you are doing link bonding and bridging in accordance with my previous post &#8220;Xen 3.3 in RHEL/CentOS 5 and more Link Aggregation &#8230; <a href="http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/10/xen-3-4-1-on-rhelcentos-5-4/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to report that the updated <a href="http://www.gitco.de/repo/" target="_blank">Gitco</a> Xen 3.4.1 repo is working well on CentOS 5.4.</p>
<p>If you are doing link bonding and bridging in accordance with my  previous post &#8220;<a href="../2009/01/xen-33-in-rhelcentos-5-and-more-link-aggregation-fun/">Xen  3.3 in RHEL/CentOS 5 and more Link Aggregation Fun</a>&#8220;, you no longer  need to patch the network scripts as RedHat fixed the initscripts  package in RHEL 5.4.</p>
<h3>Upgrade procedure for CentOS 5.3 to 5.4:</h3>
<pre>yum clean all
yum update glibc\*
yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*
yum clean all
yum upgrade
reboot</pre>
<h3>Updated Xen Install Guide From My Previous Article:</h3>
<p>Head over to <a href="http://www.gitco.de/repo/" target="_blank">http://www.gitco.de/repo/</a> and grab the repo for your arch.  (Most likely wget  http://www.gitco.de/repo/CentOS5-GITCO_x86_64.repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/  for the uninitiated).</p>
<p>If you already have Xen installed, you may need to remove and readd  it.</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">yum groupremove Virtualization
yum groupinstall Virtualization</pre>
<p>You’ll also get some updated tools like Virtual Machine Monitor 0.7.0  that make it easier to install newer guests such as Fedora 11 or  Ubuntu.  Sweet!</p>
<p>Double check /etc/sysconfig/kernel.  It should be set to kernel-xen.   Likewise, check /boot/grub.conf and make sure that the Xen kernel is  the default if the aforementioned was not done beforehand.</p>
<p>Reboot!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/10/xen-3-4-1-on-rhelcentos-5-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kernel developers don&#8217;t get Xen</title>
		<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/06/kernel-developers-dont-get-xen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/06/kernel-developers-dont-get-xen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kev009</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datacenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.6.31]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dom0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paravirt_ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kev009.com/wp/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent bruhaha surrounding Xen on LKML (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/2/475) is really disheartening.  Essentially, the Linux kernel devs are at a disconnect with users.  Some are proposing narrow-minded ideas such as DROPPING software paravirt or merging Xen as a whole into the &#8230; <a href="http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/06/kernel-developers-dont-get-xen/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent bruhaha surrounding <a href="http://xen.org/">Xen</a> on <a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/2/475" target="_blank">LKML (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/2/475)</a> is really disheartening.  Essentially, the Linux kernel devs are at a disconnect with users.  Some are proposing narrow-minded ideas such as DROPPING software paravirt or merging Xen as a whole into the kernel.</p>
<p>I use Xen for a few primary reasons:  it bar none has the best speed &#8212; full software paravirtualization pays dividends here;  it is mature;  it works on perfectly good machines that don&#8217;t happen to have the latest chips;  it does hardware passthrough on these same systems;  it has great live migration that actually works.</p>
<p>Ingo Molnar wants you to send all your perfectly good enterprise iron to the landfill even though these systems will last 10+ useful years without boneheaded software decisions such as this.</p>
<p>These same FUDsters want to strip the crossplatform nature of Xen dom0 out too.  Xen dom0 runs on <a href="http://www.netbsd.org/" target="_blank">NetBSD</a> and Solaris.  It is a true hypervisor and will plug into exisiting architectures, and not force you to use Linux for everything.</p>
<p>I have to admire all the hoops Jeremy Fitzhardinge has jumped through to date, as I know my patience is wearing thin.</p>
<p>Xen powers huge sites such as <a href="http://amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a> and services like <a href="http://linode.com" target="_blank">linode.com</a>/<a href="http://slicehost.com" target="_blank">slicehost.com</a>.  By not having dom0 in the kernel where distros such as Ubuntu and Fedora can easily integrate it, kernel devs are doing a disservice to users.</p>
<p>I use KVM, VMWare, and Virtual Box at work in addition, but Xen is firmly entrenched in my toolbox.  The <a href="http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenRoadMap" target="_blank">roadmap</a> they have looks great, and I just don&#8217;t see a reason for decline in Xen popularity.  High availability in Xen 4.0 is what I&#8217;ve always been waiting for.</p>
<p>Jeremy has gone to great lengths to work with upstream but keeps getting shot down and asked to do something else when he meets one requirement.  The solution is to merge Jeremy&#8217;s conservative dom0 patch set and work on a technical solution to the patches that the FUDsters consider bad.  It&#8217;s what the users want!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009/06/kernel-developers-dont-get-xen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

