FS-Cache merged in Kernel 2.6.30

FS-Cache has been merged into the upcoming kernel 2.6.30.  This allows for a generic caching interface in the kernel for other file systems.  For example, you can use local hard disks to cache data accessed via NFS, AFS, or CD-Rom.  Since these tend to be high-latency while the disks are low latency, it should provide for a nice speedup.

Of particular interest to me, I contacted maintainer David Howells who is a Redhat employee.  I asked whether this infrastructure would help with large disk image files stored on NFS — a common though not particularly efficient case for VMWare, Xen, KVM, etc.  His exact response was “Quite feasible.  As long as you have a local disk on which to cache the files.”

I am quite happy as I run this setup at work for some production VMs since it allows for easy migration and backup without the complexity and cost of a SAN or cluster FS.  I look forward to testing when 2.6.30 hits the stable tree.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FSDaily
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Related posts:

  1. DRBD merged with kernel 2.6.33 DRBD has been a long standing external patch in many...
  2. Kernel 2.6.30 is a Go I initially thought this would be a rather uninteresting release,...
  3. Linux Kernel 2.6.21 and Tickless Kernel (CONFIG_NO_HZ) So Linux kernel 2.6.21 is finally out and all the...
  4. Kernel developers don’t get Xen The recent bruhaha surrounding Xen on LKML (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/2/475) is really...
  5. Xen 3.4.1 on RHEL/CentOS 5.4 I’m happy to report that the updated Gitco Xen 3.4.1...

2 Responses to “FS-Cache merged in Kernel 2.6.30”

  1. Links 06/04/2009: IBM Withdraws Sun Offer, Linux Gets FS-Cache | Boycott Novell Says:

    [...] FS-Cache merged in Kernel 2.6.30 FS-Cache has been merged into the upcoming kernel 2.6.30. This allows for a generic caching interface in the kernel for other file systems. For example, you can use local hard disks to cache data accessed via NFS, AFS, or CD-Rom. Since these tend to be high-latency while the disks are low latency, it should provide for a nice speedup. [...]

  2. IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 6th, 2009 | Boycott Novell Says:

    [...] did you see this < http://www.kev009.com/wp/2009…; [...]

Leave a Reply