<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Kernel 2.6.21 and Tickless Kernel (CONFIG_NO_HZ)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/</link>
	<description>Speed and Accuracy are fine, kev009 is final: Projects and Ventures of Kevin Bowling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:07:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kev009</title>
		<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>kev009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 03:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/26/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t really gauge the responsiveness since this is a headless server and everything it is doing is for throughput.  From what I understand however, you get the benefits of both worlds.  I too am waiting for the x86_64 patches, and will revisit this when they are merged into mainline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really gauge the responsiveness since this is a headless server and everything it is doing is for throughput.  From what I understand however, you get the benefits of both worlds.  I too am waiting for the x86_64 patches, and will revisit this when they are merged into mainline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarkko</title>
		<link>http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>jarkko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kev009.com/wp/2007/04/26/linux-kernel-2621-and-tickless-kernel-config_no_hz/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Do you get the &quot;responsiveness&quot; of a 1000Hz ticking kernel with a tickless one? Or where to compare the tickless vs. 100Hz, 250Hz, 300Hz or 1000Hz ? Waiting for X86_64 tickless kernel....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you get the &#8220;responsiveness&#8221; of a 1000Hz ticking kernel with a tickless one? Or where to compare the tickless vs. 100Hz, 250Hz, 300Hz or 1000Hz ? Waiting for X86_64 tickless kernel&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
